The influence of decision-making rules on individual preference for ecological restoration: Evidence from an experimental survey
Nobuyuki Ito,
Kenji Takeuchi (),
Koichi Kuriyama,
Yasushi Shoji,
Takahiro Tsuge and
Yohei Mitani Additional contact information Nobuyuki Ito: Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University
Koichi Kuriyama: School of Political Science and Economics, Waseda University
Yasushi Shoji: Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University
Takahiro Tsuge: Faculty of Economics, Konan University
Yohei Mitani: School of Political Science and Economics, Waseda University
Abstract:
We conduct an experimental survey to analyze how rules for collective decision-making influence individual preferences concerning nature restoration projects. Our study compares two decision-making rules - a consensus rule and a majority rule - wherein participants decide on a plan concerning nature restoration in the Kushiro Wetland, Japan. Our main finding is that the difference between the individual preferences and collective decision-making is less significant under the consensus rule than the majority rule. Furthermore, there is a larger disparity with regard to the marginal willingness to pay between collective and individual decisions when participants are unsatisfied with the results of collective choice.