Do Human Rights Offenders Oppose Human Rights Resolutions in the United Nations?

Axel Dreher () and Bernhard Boockmann ()

No 07-163, KOF Working papers from KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich

Abstract: We investigate voting behavior on human rights in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). Our central question is whether countries with a low human rights record systematically oppose human rights resolutions. An instrumental account of voting would suggest that these countries aim to weaken UN human rights resolutions since they could be future targets of these policies. If reputation aspects and other non-instrumental motives dominate, the influence can go in either direction. We estimate determinants of voting on the basis of 13,000 individual voting decisions from 1980 to 2002. Our results from ordered probit estimation show that a country’s human rights situation is irrelevant to voting behavior if regional dependence of voting is controlled for. This suggests that countries’ voting decisions are not made independently from each other. The results also show that simple rules for aggregating voting choices can lead to misleading results.

Keywords: Voting; Human Rights; United Nations; Instrumental Voting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D78 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-dcm and nep-pol
Date: 2007-04
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.kof.ethz.ch/publications/science/pdf/wp_163.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kof:wpskof:07-163

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in KOF Working papers from KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by ().