Optimal CRA Reform Balancing Government Regulation and Market Forces

Kenneth H. Thomas

Economics Public Policy Brief Archive from Levy Economics Institute, The

Abstract: At issue in the debate over the renewal of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (CRA) are the various yardsticks regulators use to judge whether individual institutions are meeting the credit and service needs of low- and moderate-income (LMI) communities. Based on careful examination of new CRA data and assessments of comments by selected stakeholders, the author concludes that if the new rules are to succeed, regulators will have to strike a careful balance between various competing interests vying to tip the balance of power in their favor. For example, to offset the effects of a possibly too-close relationship between industry and government agencies, the rules could mandate very explicit and objective measures of institutions' lending performance. To relieve the burden of compliance, the rules could be simplified and pared down to their essentials. And to prevent banks from taking advantage of vulnerable members of LMI communities, rule makers could adopt strong measures against "predatory lending."

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pke and nep-ure
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.levy.org/pubs/ppb68.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lev:levppb:68

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Public Policy Brief Archive from Levy Economics Institute, The
Series data maintained by Barbara Murphy ().