The War on Poverty After 40 Years: A Minskyan Assessment

L. Randall Wray

Economics Public Policy Brief Archive from Levy Economics Institute, The

Abstract: From this paper's Preface, by Dr. Dimitri B. Papadimitriou, President: Twenty to 25 years ago, a debate was under way in academe and in the popular press over the War on Poverty (WOP). One group of scholars argued that the war, initiated by Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, had been lost, owing to the inherent ineffectiveness of government welfare programs. Charles Murray and other scholars argued that welfare programs only encouraged shiftlessness and burdened federal and state budgets. In recent years, despite the fact that the extent of poverty has not significantly diminished since the early 1970s, the debate over poverty has seemingly ended. In a country in which middle-class citizens struggle to afford health insurance and other necessities, the problems of the worstoff Americans seem to many remote and less than pressing. Moreover, the welfare reform bill of 1996 has deflected much of the criticism of the welfare state by ending the individual-level entitlement to Aid to Families with Dependent Children benefits (now known as Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) and putting time limits on welfare recipiency, among other measures.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pke
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.levy.org/pubs/ppb78.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The "War on Poverty" after 40 Years: A Minskyan Assessment (2004)
Working Paper: The 'War on Poverty' after 40 Years: A Minskyan Assessment (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lev:levppb:78

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Public Policy Brief Archive from Levy Economics Institute, The
Series data maintained by Barbara Murphy ().