A Test of the Rational Expectations Hypothesis using data from a Natural Experiment

Anna Conte (), Peter Moffatt (), Fabrizio Botti (), Daniela Teresa Di Cagno () and Carlo D'Ippoliti ()
Additional contact information
Peter Moffatt: School of Economics, University of East Anglia

Quaderni DPTEA from Department of Economic and Business Sciences, LUISS Guido Carli

Abstract: Data on contestantsÕ choices in Italian Game Show Affari Tuoi are analysed in a way that separates the effect of risk attitude from that of beliefs concerning the amount of money that will be offered to contestants in future rounds. The importance of belief-formation is confirmed by the estimation of a mixture model which establishes that the vast majority of contestants are forward-looking as opposed to myopic. The most important issue addressed in the paper is what belief function is actually being used by contestants. This function is estimated in an unconstrained way as a component of the choice model, which is estimated using maximum simulated likelihood. Separate identification of the belief function and preferences is possible by virtue of the fact that at a certain stage of the game, beliefs are not relevant, and risk attitude is the sole determinant of choice. The rational expectations hypothesis is tested by comparing the estimated belief function with the ÒtrueÓ offer function which is estimated using data on offers actually made to contestants. We find that there is a significant difference between these two functions, and hence we reject the rational expectations hypothesis. However, when a simpler Òrule-of-thumbÓ structure is assumed for the belief function, we find a correspondence to the function obtained from data on actual offers. Our overall conclusion is that contestants are rational to the extent that they make use of all available relevant information, but are not fully rational because they are not processing the information in an optimal way. The importance of allowing the choice data to convey the belief function without prejudice is emphasised.

Keywords: beliefs; discrete choice models; simulated likelihood; natural experiments; rational expectations; risky choices (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C15 C23 C25 D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-dcm and nep-upt
Date: 2007-08

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.luiss.it/RePEc/pdf/q146.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found

Related works:
Working Paper: A Test of the Rational Expectations Hypothesis using data from a Natural Experiment (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lui:wpaper:146

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Quaderni DPTEA from Department of Economic and Business Sciences, LUISS Guido Carli
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Daniela Di Cagno ().