Why Banning the Worst Forms of Child Labour Would Hurt Poor Countries

Sylvain Dessy () and Stephane Pallage

Cahiers de recherche from Université Laval - Département d'économique

Abstract:

Although it is intuitive and morally compelling that the worst forms of child labour should be eliminated, banning them in poor countries is unlikely to be welfare improving and can come at the expense of human capital accumulation. We show that the existence of harmful forms of child labour, in fact, has an economic role: it helps keep wages for child labour high enough to allow human capital accumulation. Therefore, unless appropriate mechanisms are designed to mitigate the decline in child labour wages caused by reduced employment options for children, a ban on harmful forms of child labour will likely prove undesirable in poor countries. We perform our analysis within a simple two-period model of parental investment in children's education and nutritional quality.

Keywords: Child labour; Human capital; Nutrition; Development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I00 J20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mic
Date: Written 2001

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ecn.ulaval.ca/w3/recherche/cahiers/2001/0109.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Why Banning the Worst Forms of Child Labour Would Hurt Poor Countries (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Cahiers de recherche from Université Laval - Département d'économique
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Johanne Perron ().