Abstract:
This paper develops a typology of different behaviors that might be viewed as outrageous by a jury and subjected to punitive damages. The paper derives the level of punitive damages for achieving economic efficiency in four different situation - malice and three settings where a jury might find reckless disregard - a rational response to insufficient compensatory damages, a nonrational disregard to risk, and a rational response when compensatory damages are adequate.
Keywords:LAW (search for similar items in EconPapers) JEL-codes:K10K13 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Date: 1997
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (MIT), DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, 50 MEMORIAL DRIVE CAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTS 02142 USA