Abstract:
Tests of the predictability of stock returns may be invalid when the predictor variable is persistent and its innovations are highly correlated with returns. This paper proposes two methods to deal with the problem. First,we develop a pretest that determines when the conventional t-test is misleading. Second,we develop a new test of predictability that always leads to correct inference and is efficient compared to existing methods. Applying our methods to US data,we find that the conventional t-test is highly misleading for the dividend-price ratio and the smoothed earnings-price ratio. However,we find evidence for predictability using our test, particularly with the earnings-price ratio. We also find evidence for predictability with the short-term interest rate and the long-short yield spread,for which the conventional t-test leads to correct inference.
Downloads: (external link) http://www.nber.org/papers/w10026.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html.
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc Address: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .