Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (to Each Other)?

Jason Abrevaya and Daniel Hamermesh ()

No 15972, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: Using a very large sample of matched author-referee pairs, we examine how the gender of referees and authors affects the former’s recommendations. Relying on changing matches of authors and referees, we find no evidence of gender differences among referees in charitableness toward authors; nor do we find any effect of the interaction between the referees’ and authors’ gender. With substantial research showing gender differences in fairness, the results suggest that an ethos of objectivity can overcome tendencies toward same-group favoritism/opposite-group discrimination.

JEL-codes: J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-05
Note: LS
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w15972.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (To Each Other)? (2012)
Working Paper: Charity and Favoritism in the Field: Are Female Economists Nicer (To Each Other)? (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:15972

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w15972

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Address: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by ().