Abstract:
This paper shows that standard empirical methods for estimating log-linearized" consumption Euler equations cannot successfully uncover structural parameters like the" coefficient of relative risk aversion from the dataset of simulated consumers behaving exactly" according to the standard model. Furthermore, consumption growth for the simulated consumers" is very highly statistically related to predictable income growth - and thus standard excess" sensitivity' tests would reject the hypothesis that consumers are behaving according to the" standard model. Results are not much better for the second-order approximation to the Euler" equation. The paper concludes that empirical estimation of consumption Euler equations should" not be abandoned, and discusses some alternative empirical strategies that are not subject to the" problems of Euler equation estimation.
Downloads: (external link) http://www.nber.org/papers/w6298.pdf (application/pdf)
Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html.
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc Address: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .