Risk and Risk Management in English Agriculture c. 1750-1850

David Stead
Additional contact information
David Stead: University of York

No _051, Oxford University Economic and Social History Series from Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford

Abstract: This article scrutinises the claim that the residual claimant in English agriculture was the fixed-rent tenant farmer rather than the landlord. Examination of methods of agricultural insurance and risk management indicates that the income risks of farming were sizeable, not straightforward to manage, and largely borne by the tenant. Thus the farmer’s profit appears to have fluctuated by more over time and space than did the rent paid to the landlord. Attempts are made to assess changes over time in the nature and size of the production and price risks that farmers were exposed to.

Date: 2003-10-01

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/Economics/History/Paper51/51stead.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nuf:esohwp:_051

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Oxford University Economic and Social History Series from Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Maxine Collett ().