Rational Beliefs or Distorted Beliefs: Equity Premium Puzzle and Micro Survey Data

Cheolbeom Park ()

Departmental Working Papers from National University of Singapore, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper examines whether the Sharpe ratios constructed from survey forecasts are favorable to the rational approach or the irrational approach in explaining the equity premium puzzle. T-tests, bias tests, and structural break tests for the bias are conducted for the examination. The results appear more favorable to the irrational approach. The average Sharpe ratios constructed from the Livingston survey forecasts lie within the Hansen-Jagannathan bound in most cases. Almost all individual economists have significant biases in forecasts. Furthermore, those biases seem to vary over the business cycle, which is consistent with a seemingly ad hoc assumption in the irrational approach.

Keywords: Survey forecasts; Rational expectation; Habit formation; Distorted beliefs; T-tests; Bias tests (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe and nep-cfn
Date: 2003-05
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.fas.nus.edu.sg/ecs/pub/wp/wp0303.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nus:nusewp:wp0303

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Departmental Working Papers from National University of Singapore, Department of Economics
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by ().