Costly Intermediation and the Poverty of NationsShankha Chakraborty () and Amartya Lahiri University of Oregon Economics Department Working Papers from University of Oregon Economics Department Abstract: Distortions in private investment due to credit frictions, and in public investment due to corruption and bureaucratic inefficiencies, have both been suggested as important factors in accounting for the cross-country per capita income distribution. We introduce two modifications to the standard one-sector neoclassical growth model to incorporate these distortions. The model is calibrated using data from 79 countries to examine the quantitative implication of these margins. We find that financial frictions account for less than 2% of the cross-country variation in relative income. Even accounting for mismeasurement, financial frictions can typically explain less than 5% of the income gap between the five richest and the five poorest countries in the world. Distortions in the public investment process, on the other hand, seem more promising. There is both more variation in the measured value of the public capital distortion and it can account for more than 25% of the income gap between the richest and poorest countries in our sample. Keywords: Relative Income; Agency Costs; Credit Frictions; Public Capital (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Access Statistics for this paper More papers in University of Oregon Economics Department Working Papers from University of Oregon Economics Department |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
Econpapers is hosted by the
Swedish Business School at Örebro University.