A Comparison of Multi-step GDP Forecasts for South Africa

Guillaume Chevillon ()

No 212, Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics

Abstract: To forecast at several, say h, periods into the future, a modeller faces two techniques: iterating one-step ahead forecasts (the IMS technique) or directly modeling the relation betwen observations separated by an h-period interval and using it for forecasting (DMS forecasting). It is known that structural breaks, unit-root non-stationarity and residual autocorrelation benefit DMS accuracy in finite samples, all of which occuring when modelling the South African GDP over the last thirty years. This paper analyzes the forecasting properties of the model developed by Aron and Muellbauer (2002) and compares with them that of 30 derived or competing models. We find that the GDP of South Africa is best forecast, 4 quarters ahead, using the technique developed by these authors and its variants as derived in the present paper. Rankings of other models vary over time and it is difficult to recommend one of them as a rule in this exercise.

Keywords: Multi-step Forecasting; Structural Breaks; Forecast Comparisons (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C22 C53 E3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/Research/wp/pdf/paper212.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: A Comparison of Multi-step GDP Forecasts for South Africa (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oxf:wpaper:212

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Series Working Papers from University of Oxford, Department of Economics
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Mark George ().