Does On-Farm quality Assurance Pay? A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the GrainSafe Program
Umit Karaca (),
Dirk Maier () and
Corinne Alexander Additional contact information Umit Karaca: Department of Agricultural and Biological Enginering, College of Agriculture, Purdue University
Dirk Maier: Department of Agricultural and Biological Enginering, College of Agriculture, Purdue University
Abstract:
Since the introduction of genetically modified (GM) crops, the commodity grain system has been under pressure to segregate GM and non-GM crops. Starting at the level of the grain handler, members of the grain supply chain have successfully used quality assurance and identity preservation programs to segregate non-GM crops. Producers delivering high value, identity preserved crops have become interested in implementing these quality management systems at the farm level. We conduct a cost-benefit analysis that shows that quality assurance program may be profitable for producers, depending on their farm size and equipment management strategy.