Integrated Pest Management Portfolios in UK Arable Farming: Results of a Farmer Survey

Alastair StJohn Bailey (), Marco Bertaglia, Iain Fraser (), Abhijit Sharma () and Elodie Douarin

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: BACKGROUND. Farmers are faced with a wide range of pest management (PM) options which can be adopted in isolation or alongside complement or substitute strategies. This paper presents the results of a survey of UK cereal producers focusing on the character and diversity of PM strategies currently used by, or available to, farmers. In addition, the survey asked various questions pertaining to agricultural policy participation, attitude toward environmental issues, sources of PM advice and information and the important characteristics of PM technologies. RESULTS. The results indicate that many farmers do make use of a suite of PM techniques and that their choice of integrated PM (IPM) portfolio appears to be jointly dictated by farm characteristics and Government policy. Results also indicate that portfolio choice does affect the number of subsequent insecticide applications per crop. CONCLUSIONS. These results help to identify the type of IPM portfolios considered adoptable by farmers and highlight the importance of substitution in IPM portfolios. As such, these results will help to direct R&D effort toward the realisation of more sustainable PM approaches and aid the identification of potential portfolio adopters. These findings highlight the opportunity a revised agri-environmental policy design could generate in terms of by enhancing coherent IPM portfolio adoption.

Keywords: Pest management; pesticide alternatives; technology and portfolio approaches (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q16 Q55 O14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr and nep-env
Date: 2009-04
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/14764/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:14764

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany
Address: Schackstr. 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Ekkehart Schlicht ().