MOVING TO OPPORTUNITY AND TRANQUILITY: NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS ON ADULT ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY AND HEALTH FROM A RANDOMIZED HOUSING VOUCHER EXPERIMENT

MOVING TO OPPORTUNITY AND TRANQUILITY: NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS ON ADULT ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY AND HEALTH FROM A RANDOMIZED HOUSING VOUCHER EXPERIMENT

Jeffrey Kling, Jeffrey B. Liebman (), Lawrence F. Katz () and Lisa Sanbonmatsu
Additional contact information
Jeffrey Kling: Princeton University and NBER
Lisa Sanbonmatsu: NBER

No 247, Working Papers from Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Health and Wellbeing.

Abstract: We study adult economic and health outcomes in the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) demonstration, a randomized housing mobility experiment in which families living in highpoverty U.S. public housing projects in five cities were given vouchers to help them move to private housing units in lower-poverty neighborhoods. An “experimental” group was offered vouchers valid only in a low-poverty neighborhood; a “Section 8” group was offered traditional housing vouchers without geographic restriction; a control group was not offered vouchers. Our sample consists largely of black and Hispanic female household heads with children. Five years after random assignment, the families offered housing vouchers through MTO lived in safer neighborhoods that had significantly lower poverty rates than those of the control group not offered vouchers. However, we find no significant overall effects on adult employment, earnings, or public assistance receipt -- though our sample sizes are not sufficiently large to rule out moderate effects in either direction. In contrast, we do find significant mental health benefits of the MTO intervention for the experimental group. We also demonstrate a more general pattern for the mental health results using both treatment groups of systematically larger effect sizes for groups experiencing larger changes in neighborhood poverty rates. In our analysis of physical health outcomes, we find a significant reduction in obesity, but no significant effects on four other aspects of physical health (general health, asthma, physical limitations, and hypertension), and our summary measure of physical health was not significantly affected by the MTO treatment for the overall sample.

JEL-codes: I18 I38 J38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-04
View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://rpds.princeton.edu/rpds/papers/pdfs/Kling_mto481.pdf

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:cheawb:247

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Health and Wellbeing.
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by David Long ().