The Plant Size-Place Effect: Agglomeration and Monopsony in Labour Markets

Alan Manning ()

No 1109, Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section.

Abstract: This paper shows, using data from both the US and the UK, that average plant size is larger in denser markets. However, many popular theories of agglomeration spillovers, cost advantages and improved match quality predict that establishments should be smaller in cities. The paper proposes a theory based on monopsony in labour markets that can explain the stylized fact that firms in all labour markets have some market power but that they have less market power in cities. It also presents evidence that the labour supply curve to individual firms is more elastic in larger markets.

Keywords: Agglomeration; Labour Markets; Monopsony; monopsony papers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J21 J42 R23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-geo, nep-ltv and nep-ure
Date: 2008-12
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.irs.princeton.edu/pubs/pdfs/539.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: The plant size-place effect: agglomeration and monopsony in labour markets (2010)
Working Paper: The Plant Size-Place Effect: Agglomeration and Monopsony in Labour Markets (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:indrel:1109

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section.
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by David Long ().