Abstract:
Shame and humiliation are central to the understanding of poverty yet internationally comparable data on this dimension are missing. Based on existing indicators from related fields, this article suggests eight indicators to measure specific aspects of shame and humiliation that could start an in-depth debate around this topic. The indicators are the following: whether respondents would feel shame if they were poor; levels of shame proneness; perceptions of respectful treatment, unfair treatment and prejudiced treatment; whether respondents perceive that their ethnic, racial or cultural background affects their chances of getting jobs, services and education; whether respondents perceive that economic conditions affect their chances of getting jobs, services and education; and levels of accumulated humiliation.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-edu and nep-hap Date: 2007-05
More papers in OPHI Working Papers from Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford Address: Queen Elizabeth House 3 Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3TB United Kingdom Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Rachel Crawford ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .