An Empirical Investigation of the Mergers Decision Process in Australia

Robert Vincent Breunig () and Flavio Menezes ()

No 382, Discussion Papers Series from University of Queensland, School of Economics

Abstract: In this paper we examine a database assembled from an Australian public register of 553 merger decisions taken between March 2004 and July 2008. Mergers may be accepted without public assessment, accepted in conjunction with publication of a Public Competition Assessment, or rejected. We estimate an ordered probit model, using these three possible outcomes, with the objective of gaining better insight into the regulator’s decision-making process. Our two major findings are: (i) the existence of entry barriers and the existence of undertakings are highly correlated with the regulator’s decision to closely scrutinise a merger proposal; and (ii) if we compare two decisions, one which does not mention entry barriers (or import competition) with a decision that does mention entry barriers (or import competition), then the latter is significantly more likely to be opposed than the former.

Date: 2008
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/abstract/382.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:qld:uq2004:382

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers Series from University of Queensland, School of Economics
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Tobin Millen ().