Abstract:
Standard business cycle models with state-additive preferences, while broadly consistent with the behavior of real macroeconomic aggregates, are unable to generate asymmetries between expansions and recessions, and are also inconsistent with the behavior of asset prices. In this paper we exploit the potential of non-additivity in preferences to address these facts. In particular, we use Routledge and Zin's (2004) generalization of Gul's (1991) notion of disappointment aversion. The key feature of Routledge and Zin's preferences is that disappointment occurs away from certainty potentially generating counter-cyclical risk aversion. We introduce disappointment aversion in the standard RBC model and ask whether it is able to simultaneously account for business cycle asymmetries between recessions and expansions and asset pricing facts, while still being consistent with the standard business cycle facts
More papers in 2006 Meeting Papers from Society for Economic Dynamics Address: Society for Economic Dynamics Anne Stubing CV Starr Center for Applied Economics 269 Mercer Street, Room 303 New York University New York, NY 10003 Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Christian Zimmermann ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .