Abstract:
The two main trends in gender differentials in the last decade suggest an apparently contradictory picture: women still experience a significant negative differential in wages but not in education, where they moved from a negative to a positive differential. We propose and estimate a model where employer’s discrimination is allow to change over-time. Females have the same preferences as males, and, other things being equal, would, on average, make the same human capital investment and labor market decisions. However, because of an (endogenous) comparative advantage in child rearing, more women choose to suspend labor market attachment than their male partners in their prime age. Hence, because of a standard statistical discrimination argument, they receive lower labor market outcomes than males. The only way they can compensate for the loss arising from statistical discrimination is to choose higher investment in human capital, generating equilibria where female average human capital investment is higher than males'. If discrimination is too high, however, no reasonable amount of higher human capital investment can compensate for the difference and more women choose to specialize in home production
Keywords:Gender discrimination; Education gap (search for similar items in EconPapers) JEL-codes:J7 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Date: 2006-12-03
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works: This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
More papers in 2006 Meeting Papers from Society for Economic Dynamics Address: Society for Economic Dynamics Anne Stubing CV Starr Center for Applied Economics 269 Mercer Street, Room 303 New York University New York, NY 10003 Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Christian Zimmermann ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .