An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage in Informal University Technology Transfer
Donald Siegel () and
Barry Bozeman ()
Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Economics
Formal university technology transfer mechanisms, through licensing agreements, research joint ventures, and university-based startups, have attracted considerable attention in the academic literature. Surprisingly, there has been little systematic empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal technology transfer. This paper presents empirical evidence on the determinants of three types of informal technology transfer by faculty members: knowledge transfer, joint publications with industry scientists, and consulting. We find that male and tenured faculty members are more likely to engage in all three forms of informal technology transfer. We also find that academics who allocate a relatively higher percentage of their time to grants-related research are more likely to engage in informal commercial knowledge transfer.
JEL-codes: M13 D24 L31 O31 O32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ino, nep-sog and nep-tid
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (25) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer * (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rpi:rpiwpe:0610
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Shawn Kantor (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .