Attracting and Retaining Teachers in High-Need Schools: Do Financial Incentives Make Financial Sense?

Jennifer Imazeki

No 30, Working Papers from San Diego State University, Department of Economics

Abstract: This study synthesizes what we know and do not know about policies to attract and retain teachers in high-need schools and assesses the relative cost-effectiveness of two types of policies. Research consistently shows that teacher quality is likely to be lower in schools with higher proportions of students from disadvantaged backgrounds. This pattern is likely a result of several factors but the most well-documented is teachers’ mobility choices within and across districts. Although there are numerous programs across the country intended to attract and retain highly-skilled teachers in high-need schools, there is very little assessment of their effectiveness. Given the lack of evidence on specific interventions, I use the results from existing studies of teacher mobility and attrition to compare the effect of salary incentives and induction or mentoring programs. Although financial incentives are arguably the most straightforward policies for states and districts to adopt, high-need schools may be better served if policymakers and researchers devoted more attention to more cost-effective alternatives.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu, nep-lab and nep-ure
Date: 2008-01
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/dept/econ/WPSeries/08_01.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sds:wpaper:0030

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from San Diego State University, Department of Economics
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Ginger Shoulders ().