Bargaining Frictions, Labor Income Taxation, and Economic Performance
Stéphane Auray and
Samuel Danthine ()
Additional contact information Samuel Danthine: Universite du Quebec a Montreal, Universidad de Malaga and CIRPEE
Abstract:
This paper is an attempt to explain differences in economic performance between a subset of OECD countries. We classify countries in terms of their degree of rigidity in the labor market, and use a matching model with labor/leisure choice, bargaining frictions, and labor income taxation to capture these rigidity differences. Added flexibility improves economic performance in different ways depending on whether income taxation is high or low. Feeding income taxation rates estimated from the countries at hand, we find that the model is able to replicate the observed rigidity levels. The model is also shown to reproduce well cross-country differences in non-employment population ratios and the share of part-time jobs.