A Comparative Study of Monte Carlo Methods for Efficient Evaluation of Marginal Likelihood
Lennart Hoogerheide and
Herman K. van Dijk
Additional contact information
David Ardia: University of Fribourg, aeris CAPITAL AG, Switzerland
Nalan Basturk: Erasmus University Rotterdam
Lennart Hoogerheide: Erasmus University Rotterdam
Herman K. van Dijk: Erasmus University Rotterdam
No 10-059/4, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute
This discussion paper resulted in an article in Computational Statistics & Data Analysis (2012). Vol. 56(11), 3398-3414. Strategic choices for efficient and accurate evaluation of marginal likelihoods by means of Monte Carlo simulation methods are studied for the case of highly non-elliptical posterior distributions. A comparative analysis is presented of possible advantages and limitations of different simulation techniques; of possible choices of candidate distributions and choices of target or warped target distributions; and finally of numerical standard errors. The importance of a robust and flexible estimation strategy is demonstrated where the complete posterior distribution is explored. Given an appropriately yet quickly tuned adaptive candidate, straightforward importance sampling provides a computationally efficient estimator of the marginal likelihood (and a reliable and easily computed corresponding numerical standard error) in the cases investigated in this paper, which include a non-linear regression model and a mixture GARCH model. Warping the posterior density can lead to a further gain in efficiency, but it is more important that the posterior kernel is appropriately wrapped by the candidate distribution than that is warped.
Keywords: marginal likelihood; Bayes factor; importance sampling; bridge sampling; adaptive mixture of Student-t distributions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C11 C15 C52 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tin:wpaper:20100059
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers from Tinbergen Institute
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 ().