Is a State VAT the Answer? What’s the Question?

Richard M. Bird ()

No 0703 Classification - JEL: H71, International Tax Program Papers from International Tax Program, Institute for International Business, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto

Abstract: I argue in this paper that state value-added tax is more likely to be the right way to tax sales at the state level than seems to be recognized in most current US discussion. As Canadian experience demonstrates, a state VAT is both better in principle than even the best state retail sales tax (RST) and should be not much more difficult to administer in practice at the state level. A principal reason why states should consider VAT as a possible replacement for an RST is to make themselves more competitive by removing the present distorting and undesirable tax on business imposed through RSTs.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc and nep-pbe
Date: 2007

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/iib/ITP0703.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ttp:itpwps:0703

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in International Tax Program Papers from International Tax Program, Institute for International Business, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Richard Bird ().