Abstract:
Abstract : It is well known that if international linkages are relatively small, the potential gains to international monetary policy coordination are typically quite limited. But what if goods and financial markets are tightly linked? Is it then problematic if countries unilaterally design their institutions for monetary stabilization? Are the stabilization gains from having separate currencies largely squandered in the absence of effective international monetary coordination? We argue that sunder plausible assumptions the answer is no. Unless risk aversion is very high, lack of coordination in rule setting is a second-order problem compared to the overall gains from monetary policy stabilization.
Downloads: (external link) http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/iber/wps/cider/c01-120.pdf main text (application/pdf) Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/iber/wps/cider/c01-120.pdf [302 Found]--> http://iber.berkeley.edu/wps/cider/c01-120.pdf)
More papers in Center for International and Development Economics Research (CIDER) Working Papers from University of California at Berkeley Address: University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .