Punishing the Innocent along with the Guilty: The Economics of Individual versus Group Punishment

Thomas Miceli () and Kathleen Segerson ()

No 2004-37, Working papers from University of Connecticut, Department of Economics

Abstract: Standard models of law enforcement involve the apprehension and punishment of a single suspect, but in many contexts, punishment is actually imposed on an entire group known to contain the offender. The advantages of .group punishment. are that the offender is punished with certainty and detection costs are saved. The disadvantage is that innocent individuals are punished. We compare individual and group punishment when social welfare depends on fairness, and when it depends on deterrence. We show that group punishment may dominate in the former case if the detection technology is ineffective but never in the latter case. We discuss our results in the context of several examples.

Keywords: Group punishment; Law enforcement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K14 K42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
Date: 2004-10
Note: We acknowledge the insightful comments and suggestions of Nuno Garoupa and Steven Shavell.
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econ.uconn.edu/working/2004-37.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Punishing the Innocent along with the Guilty: The Economics of Individual versus Group Punishment (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uct:uconnp:2004-37

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working papers from University of Connecticut, Department of Economics
Address: University of Connecticut 341 Mansfield Road, Unit 1063 Storrs, CT 06269-1063
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christian Zimmermann ().