Does Employment Protection Inhibit Labor Market Flexibility? Lessons from Germany, France and Belgium

Katharine Abraham () and Susan N. Houseman ()
Additional contact information
Susan N. Houseman: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, http://www.upjohninst.org/staff/houseman.html

No 93-16, Staff Working Papers from W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research

Abstract: Laws in most West European countries give workers strong job rights, including the right to advance notice of layoff and the right to severance pay or other compensation if laid off. Many of these same countries also encourage hours adjustment in lieu of layoffs by providing prorated unemployment compensation to workers on reduced hours. This paper compares the adjustment of manufacturing employment and hours in West Germany, France and Belgium, three countries with strong job security regulations and well-established short-time compensation systems, with that in the United States. Although the adjustment of employment to changes in output is much slower in the German, French and Belgian manufacturing sectors than in U.S. manufacturing, the adjustment of total hours worked is much more similar. The short-time system makes a significant contribution to observed adjustment in all three European countries. In addition, we find little evidence that the weakening of job security regulations that occurred in Germany, France and Belgium during the 1980s affected employers' adjustment to changes in output. These findings suggest that, given appropriate supporting institutions, strong job security need not inhibit employer adjustment to changing conditions.

Keywords: labor; market; flexibility; Europe; France; Belgium; Germany; Abraham; Houseman (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J23 J65 J83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1993-03
Note: A revised version of this paper appears in R. Blank, ed., Social Protection vs. Economic Flexibility: Is there a Trade-Off?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994. Please cite the revised version.
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.upjohninst.org/publications/wp/93-16.pdf (application/pdf)
This material is copyrighted. Permission is required to reproduce any or all parts.

Related works:
Chapter: Does Employment Protection Inhibit Labor Market Flexibility? Lessons from Germany, France, and Belgium (1994)
Working Paper: Does Employment Protection Inhibit Labor Market Flexibility? Lessons from Germany, France, and Belgium (1993)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:upj:weupjo:93-16

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.upjohnins ... cations/custsvc.html

The price is $3 by mail, pdf is free..

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff Working Papers from W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research
Address: 300 S. Westnedge Ave. Kalamazoo, MI 49007 USA
Series data maintained by ().