Abstract:
This paper applies cross-sectional and longitudinal propensity score matching estimators to data from the National Supported Work (NSW) Demonstration that have been previously analyzed by LaLonde (1986) and Dehejia and Wahba (1999, 2002). We find that estimates of the impact of NSW based on propensity score matching are highly sensitive to both the set of variables included in the scores and the particular analysis sample used in the estimation. Among the estimators we study, the difference-in-differences matching estimator performs the best. We attribute its performance to the fact that it eliminates potential sources of temporally-invariant bias present in the NSW data, such as geographic mismatch between participants and non-participants and the use of a dependent variable measured in different ways for the two groups. Our analysis demonstrates that while propensity score matching is a potentially useful econometric tool, it does not represent a general solution to the evaluation problem.
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from http://economics.uwo ... mittingordering.html The price is Paper copy available by mail at a cost of $10.00 Canadian each.
More papers in University of Western Ontario, CIBC Human Capital and Productivity Project Working Papers from University of Western Ontario, CIBC Human Capital and Productivity Project Address: CIBC Human Capital and Productivity Project, Social Science Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2 Series data maintained by ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .