Highlights of the Bullionist Controversy

David Laidler ()

No 20002, UWO Department of Economics Working Papers from University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper surveys the literature of the Bullionist controversy which dominated the development of Classical monetary economics between 1797 and the early 1820s. It highlights the contributions of Henry Thornton to the early phase of the debate, particularly his refutation of the Real Bill doctrine, and of David Ricardo to its later phases. The role of the Real Bills doctrine in the evidence given by directors of the Bank of England to the Bullion Committee of 1810 is also analysed. Ricardo's subsequent work on the resumption of convertibility, and the dissenting, sometimes inflationist, opinions of Thomas Attwood and the Birmingham School are then discussed. The paper ends with a brief account of how the Bullionist controversy influenced the later development of classical monetary economics in the 19th century.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mon
Date: Written
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ssc.uwo.ca/economics/econref/workingpap ... /wp2000/wp2000_2.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:uwo:uwowop:20002

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.ssc.uwo.c ... mittingordering.html
The price is Paper copy available by mail at a cost of $10.00 Canadian each.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in UWO Department of Economics Working Papers from University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics
Address: Department of Economics, Reference Centre, Social Science Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2
Series data maintained by ().