Growth, Death, and Taxes

Lutz Hendricks ()

No 97/7, Working Papers from Arizona State University, Department of Economics

Abstract: The literature on the growth effects of flat rate taxes focuses entirely on models with infinite horizons and constant returns to private inputs in human capital accumulation. In contrast, the traditional human capital literature assumes finite lifetimes and, based on microeconomic evidence, diminishing returns. Since human capital is not heritable, the infinite horizon framework cannot, in general, be justified as a reduced form of an overlapping generations model; it represents an approximation of unknown accuracy. This paper shows that abstracting from finite lives and diminishing returns makes an important difference for the growth effect of taxation, even if there is an operative bequest motive. Except in a knife-edge case, the growth effects of taxation become small (and may go to zero) as lifetimes get long, suggesting that infinite horizons may be a terrible approximation for long, finite horizons.

Keywords: Economic growth; human capital; taxation. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J24 O41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cob.asu.edu/ecn/papers/WP1997/wp97_7.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Growth, Death, and Taxes (2004)
Journal Article: Growth, Death, and Taxes
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Arizona State University, Department of Economics
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Thomas Krichel ().