Education and Saving: The Long-Term Effects of High School Financial Curriculum Mandates

B. Douglas Bernheim (), Daniel M. Garrett and Dean M. Maki

Working Papers from Stanford University, Department of Economics

Abstract: June 1997

Over the last forty years, the majority of states have adopted consumer education policies, and a sizable minority have specifically mandated that high school students receive instruction on topics related to household financial decision-making (budgeting, credit management, saving and investment, and so forth). In this paper, we attempt to determine whether the curricula arising from these mandates have had any discernable effect on adult decisions regarding saving. Using a unique household survey, we exploit the variation in requirements both across states and over time to identify the effects of interest. The evidence indicates that mandates have significantly raised both exposure to financial curricula and subsequent asset accumulation once exposed students reached adulthood. These effects appear to have been gradual rather than immediate -- a probable reflection of implementation lags.

Date: 1997-06
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www-econ.stanford.edu/faculty/workp/swp97012.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Education and Saving: The Long-Term Effects of High School Financial Curriculum Mandates (1997)
Journal Article: Education and saving:: The long-term effects of high school financial curriculum mandates (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wop:stanec:97012

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Stanford University, Department of Economics
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Thomas Krichel ().