Was an Industrial Revolution Inevitable? Economic Growth Over the Very Long Run

Charles I. Jones ()

Working Papers from Stanford University, Department of Economics

Abstract: September 28, 1999 -- Version 2.0

This paper studies a growth model that is able to match several key facts of economic history. For thousands of years, the average standard of living seems to have risen very little, despite increases in the level of technology and large increases in the level of the population. Then, after thousands of years of little change, the level of per capita consumption increased dramatically in less than two centuries. Quantitative analysis of the model highlights two factors central to understanding this history. The first is a virtuous circle: more people produce more ideas, which in turn makes additional population growth possible. The second is an improvement in institutions that promote innovation, such as property rights: the simulated economy indicates that the single most important factor in the transition to modern growth has been the increase in the fraction of output paid to compensate inventors for the fruits of their labor.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev, nep-dge and nep-his
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www-econ.stanford.edu/faculty/workp/swp99008.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Was an Industrial Revolution Inevitable? Economic Growth Over the Very Long Run (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wop:stanec:99008

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Stanford University, Department of Economics
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Thomas Krichel ().