Reform without Losers: An Interpretation of China's Dual-Track Approach to Transition

Lawrence J. Lau, Yingyi Qian and Gérard Roland ()

Working Papers from Stanford University, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper develops a simple model to analyze the "dual-track" approach to market liberalization as a mechanism for implementing efficient Pareto-improving economic reform, that is, reform achieving efficiency without creating losers. The approach, based on the continued enforcement of the existing plan while simultaneously liberalizing the market, can be understood as a method for making implicit lump sum transfers to compensate potential losers of the reform. The model highlights the critical roles of enforcement of the plan for achieving Pareto improvement and full liberalization of the market track for achieving efficiency. We examine how the dual-track approach has worked in product and labor market liberalization in China.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-dev, nep-his and nep-mic
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www-econ.stanford.edu/faculty/workp/swp99010.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Reform Without Losers: An Interpretation of China's Dual-Track Approach to Transition (1998)
Working Paper: Reform Without Losers: An Interpretation of China's Dual-Track Approach to Transition (1997)
Working Paper: Reform without Losers: An Interpretation of China's Dual-Track Approach to Transition (1997)
Journal Article: Reform without Losers: An Interpretation of China's Dual-Track Approach to Transition (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Stanford University, Department of Economics
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Thomas Krichel ().