Gender Bias and The Indonesian Financial Crisis: Were Girls Hit Hardest?

David Levine () and Minnie Ames
Additional contact information
Minnie Ames: Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley

Development and Comp Systems from EconWPA

Abstract: We analyze how the financial crisis affected a wide range of investments in Indonesian children and children's outcomes including school enrollment, immunizations, and mortality. Our dataset is the National Socio-Economic Survey (Susenas), a large nationally representative sample. We build on past research by differentiating outcomes for boys and for girls, and by separating regions heavily affected by the financial crisis from others that were relatively unhurt. Along most dimensions, children were well protected. Contrary to some theory and press reports, girls did not fare worse than boys during the crisis.

JEL-codes: O12 J71 D13 I21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev, nep-ifn and nep-ltv
Date: 2003-03-25
Note: 31 pages, Acrobat .pdf
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/dev/papers/0303/0303001.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Gender Bias and The Indonesian Financial Crisis: Were Girls Hit Hardest? (2003)
Working Paper: Gender Bias and The Indonesian Financial Crisis: Were Girls Hit Hardest? (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpdc:0303001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Development and Comp Systems from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().