Do Men Really have no Shame?

Abigail Barr and Bill Kinsey
Additional contact information
Abigail Barr: Centre for the Study of African Economies
Bill Kinsey: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Development and Comp Systems from EconWPA

Abstract: Microfinance is one of the most commonly applied development interventions of our time. It is also one of the most gender-biased. In part, this is due to targeting. However, it might also relate to the emphasis placed by microfinance providers on group-loans. If women have a comparative advantage when it comes to functioning in groups, they might self-select into microfinance provided as group loans, while men seek alternative sources of credit. This paper explores the possibility that such a comparative advantage exists and that it relates to women’s greater propensity to feel shame and/or induce feelings of shame in others. It uses data derived from an economic experiment conducted in 12 Zimbabwean villages to test a series of hypotheses. The findings suggest that men regard others less than women when deciding how to behave; that, even after controlling for this, they are more likely to attract criticism; and that they are no less responsive than women to such shame-inducing, social sanctioning. Finally, while men are no more inclined to sanction others they are less effective than women at effecting a resultant improvement in behaviour.

JEL-codes: O P (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
Date: 2004-09-15
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 33
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/dev/papers/0409/0409008.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Development and Comp Systems from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().