China's Reform Period Economic Growth: Why Angus Maddison Got It Wrong and What That Means

Carsten A. Holz ()

Development and Comp Systems from EconWPA

Abstract: China's economic growth statistics of the late 1990s have repeatedly been questioned. Angus Maddison in a 1998 OECD study goes further in that he revised China's official average annual real growth rate for the first seventeen years of economic reform, 1978 through 1995, downward by 2.39 percentage points per year. His study is the most thorough criticism of Chinese official statistics to date, and the one with the largest impact on the data. By 1995, the revisions imply 150% less output, in 1978 terms, than the official data do. Angus Maddison's revisions were subsequently incorporated into the Penn World Tables; the findings of countless cross-country studies are therefore affected by Angus Maddison's growth estimates for China. This paper examines Angus Maddison's revisions to official data and finds them invalid. Angus Maddison's growth estimates for China in the reform period constitute no alternative to the official data.

JEL-codes: O4 P27 O53 C82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev, nep-sea and nep-tra
Date: 2005-04-21
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 48
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/dev/papers/0504/0504012.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpdc:0504012

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Development and Comp Systems from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().