The Empire Effect: Country Risk in the First Age of Globalization, 1880-1913
Niall Ferguson and
Moritz Schularick ()
Additional contact information
Niall Ferguson: Harvard University
Economic History from EconWPA
Would the movement of capital from to poor countries greatly increase, if the commitment to protecting property and allowing capital to move freely were more credible? This paper asks whether the British Empire provided global public goods that supported large-scale development finance before 1914. We reassess the importance of colonial status to investors by means of multivariable regression analysis. We show that British colonies were able to borrow in London at significantly lower rates of interest than non-colonies precisely because of their colonial status, which overruled economic factors. We conclude that these findings have important implications for the current globalization debate: lacking jurisdictional integration is a major impediment to capital flows from rich to poor.
Keywords: sovereign risk; development finance; economic history; imperialism; globalization; bond spreads; capital market integration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E F3 K (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-fmk, nep-his and nep-mac
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 40
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpeh:0509002
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Economic History from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().