Sound and Fury: McCloskey and Significance Testing in Economics
Kevin Hoover () and
Mark Siegler ()
Econometrics from EconWPA
For about twenty years, Deidre McCloskey has campaigned to convince the economics profession that it is hopelessly confused about statistical significance. She argues that many practices associated with significance testing are bad science and that most economists routinely employ these bad practices: “Though to a child they look like science, with all that really hard math, no science is being done in these and 96 percent of the best empirical economics. . .” (McCloskey 1999). McCloskey’s charges are analyzed and rejected. That statistical significance is not economic significance is a jejune and uncontroversial claim, and there is no convincing evidence that economists systematically mistake the two. Other elements of McCloskey’s analysis of statistical significance are shown to be ill-founded, and her criticisms of practices of economists are found to be based in inaccurate readings and tendentious interpretations of their work. Properly used, significance tests are a valuable tool for assessing signal strength, for assisting in model specification, and for determining causal structure.
Keywords: statistical significance; economic significance; significance testing; regression analysis; econometric methodology; Deirdre McCloskey; Neyman-Pearson testing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C10 C12 B41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ecm and nep-hpe
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 53
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (8) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Sound and fury: McCloskey and significance testing in economics (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpem:0511018
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Econometrics from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().