Abstract:
This paper studies a two-player alternating offers bargaining model in which one of the agents has the ability to damage permanently the ``pie'' bargained over. I show how this feature can result in an increase of the cost of rejecting an offer for the ``non-harming player''. Beside the ``Rubinstenian'' bilateral monopoly outcome, I show that it is possible to select a ``harming'' equilibrium in which the sequence of damages to the pie is endogenously determined and payoffs do not vary monotonically with the discount factor.
Keywords:bargaining; commitment; destructive power (search for similar items in EconPapers) JEL-codes:C78 (search for similar items in EconPapers) New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gth and nep-mic Date: 1996-12-05 Note: Type of Document - postscript; prepared on IBM PC ; to print on PostScript; pages: 21 ; figures: included. postcript via TrueTex Previewer View list of referencesView citations in EconPapers