Between Liberalism and Democracy

Dov Samet and David Schmeidler ()
Additional contact information
Dov Samet: Tel Aviv University

Game Theory and Information from EconWPA

Abstract: We study a class of voting rules that bridge between majoritarianism and liberalism. An outcome of the vote specifies who among the voters are eligible to a certain right or qualification. Each outcome serves also as a permissible ballot. We characterize axiomatically a family of rules parameterized by the weight each individual has in determining his or her qualification. In one extreme case, the Liberal Rule, each individual's qualification is determined by her. In the other, an individual's qualification is determined by a majority. We also propose a formalization of self-determination, and apply it in a characterization of the Liberal Rule.

Keywords: liberalism; voting rules; social choice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C7 D8 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999-08-10
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 19
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/game/papers/9908/9908001.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Between Liberalism and Democracy (1998)
Working Paper: Between LIberalism and Democracy (2000)
Journal Article: Between liberalism and democracy (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpga:9908001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Game Theory and Information from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().