Institutions and the resource curse

Halvor Mehlum (), Karl Ove Moene () and Ragnar Torvik ()

GE, Growth, Math methods from EconWPA

Abstract: Countries rich in natural resources constitute both growth losers and growth winners. We claim that the main reason for these diverging experiences is differences in the quality of institutions. More natural resources push aggregate income down, when institutions are grabber friendly, while more resources raise income, when institutions are producer friendly. We test this theory building on Sachs and Warner's influential works on the resource curse. Our main hypothesis: that institutions are decisive for the resource curse, is confirmed. Our results are in sharp contrast to the claim by Sachs and Warner that institutions do not play a role.

Keywords: Natural resources; Institutional quality; Growth; Rent-seeking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O4 Q0 F43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev
Date: 2002-10-08
Note: Type of Document - pdf; prepared on latex; pages: 26
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/ge/papers/0210/0210004.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Institutions and the Resource Curse (2004)
Working Paper: Institutions and the resource curse (2002)
Working Paper: Institutions and the resource curse (2003)
Journal Article: Institutions and the Resource Curse (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpge:0210004

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in GE, Growth, Math methods from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().