Self-reported Work Disability in the US and The Netherlands

Arie Kapteyn, James P. Smith () and Arthur van Soest ()

Labor and Demography from EconWPA

Abstract: Self-reported work disability is analyzed in the US and The Netherlands. The raw data show that Dutch respondents much more often report that they have a work limiting health problem than respondents in the US. The difference remains when controlling for demographic characteristics and observed onsets of health problems. Respondent evaluations of work limitations of hypothetical persons described in vignettes are used to identify the extent to which the differences in self-reports between countries or socio-economic groups are due to systematic variation in the response scales. A model that assumes the same response scales for different health domains is compared with a model that allows for domain specific response scales. Results of both models suggest that about half of the difference between the self-reported rates of work disability in the US and The Netherlands can be explained by response scale differences.

Keywords: Work limiting disability; Vignettes; Reporting bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea and nep-lab
Date: 2005-04-15
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 40
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/lab/papers/0504/0504006.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Self-reported Work Disability in the US and The Netherlands (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpla:0504006

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Labor and Demography from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().