Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights?
Eric Neumayer ()
Law and Economics from EconWPA
After the non-binding Universal Declaration of Human Rights, many global and regional human rights treaties have been concluded. Critics argue that these are unlikely to have made any actual difference in reality. Others contend that international regimes can improve respect for human rights in state parties, particularly in more democratic countries or countries with a strong civil society devoted to human rights and with transnational links. Our findings suggest that rarely does treaty ratification have unconditional effects on human rights. Instead, improvement in human rights is typically more likely the more democratic the country or the more international non-governmental organizations its citizens participate in. Conversely, in very autocratic regimes with weak civil society, ratification can be expected to have no effect and is sometimes even associated with more rights violation.
JEL-codes: K (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
Date: 2004-11-30, Revised 2005-06-06
Note: Type of Document -
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (34) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Chapter: Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? (2006)
Journal Article: Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights? (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwple:0411003
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Law and Economics from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().