Abstract:
McGrattan and Prescott (2003) argue that the average equity premium is less than one percent when the annual data used in the computation are adjusted in certain ways: equity returns reduced by subtracting diversification costs and taxes on dividend yields, and debt yields are raised by using long-term debt (instead of 90-day T-Bills) and ignoring the 1935-1960 period of government regulation of the financial sector. This note takes the adjusted measurements proposed by McGrattan and Prescott (2003) and subjects them to statistical tests in an attempt to examine the equity premium puzzle. The findings suggest that using their series solves the `average equity premium' puzzle but the `low risk-free rate' and `excess volatility' puzzles remain as challenges to standard theory.
JEL-codes:E (search for similar items in EconPapers) New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge Date: Written 2004-02-04 Note: Type of Document - pdf; prepared on Win2000; pages: 12 View list of references