The Productivity of Convergence Debate: A Theoretical and Methodological Reconsideration

Bruce Elmslie and William Milberg
Additional contact information
Bruce Elmslie: The Jerome Levy Economics Institute
William Milberg: The Jerome Levy Economics Institute

Macroeconomics from EconWPA

Abstract: While the debate over whether and why convergence between national productivity rates between countries over time has occurred is a lively one, the discussion has largely ignored two issues: the development of a generalized theoretical model of cross-country growth patterns that could explain convergence or divergence, and disregard of alternative, well-established methodologies to measure convergence in favor of the mainstream, neoclassical model, which is argued to have problems with respect to the "operationalization of the concept of capital." Elmslie and Milberg attempt to remedy the situation by first providing an examination of the convergence debate based on an input-output analysis, and then employing an historical/institutionalist framework to explain the current wide disparities in the rates of convergence found between two countries—Japan and Portugal—that had, at one point in time, been on a similar convergence paths but that experienced two different futures.

JEL-codes: E (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999-04-15
Note: Type of Document - Acrobat PDF; prepared on IBM PC; to print on PostScript; pages: 59; figures: included

Downloads: (external link)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/mac/papers/9904/9904008.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpma:9904008

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Macroeconomics from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().