Railway regulation in 19th Century Britain: the economic rationale and legacy of Gladstone and Chadwick

Mark Bailey ()

Method and Hist of Econ Thought from EconWPA

Abstract: This paper examines the economic rationale of the ideas of Gladstone & Chadwick on railway regulation and the legacy of their ideas. In 1844 Gladstone proposed and implemented what we would now call price and quantity regulation whereas in 1859 Chadwick proposed competition "for the field", i.e. the establishment of a temporary monopoly or franchise, for a given period. The thinking of Gladstone had been influenced by the classical school of economic thought, most notably J R McCulloch, whilst Chadwick had ideas influenced by his association with Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. This ideas still impact today; the basic pattern of price and some quantity regulation inaugurated by Gladstone was not abolished until the 1960 Transport Act whilst Chadwicks idea of temporary licenses or franchises came back into vogue when the railways were privatised in 1997.

Keywords: Britain; nineteenth century; railway regulation; classical school; J R McCulloch; Edwin Chadwick; John Stuart Mill (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B12 L13 L51 L92 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003-07-09
Note: Type of Document - Acrobat PDF; prepared on IBM PC; to print on A4 Acrobat PDF; pages: 28 ; figures: included. 28 pages, Acrobat PDF, A4
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/mhet/papers/0307/0307001.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpmh:0307001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Method and Hist of Econ Thought from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().