Collective and individual rationality: Robert Malthus’s heterodox theodicy

Andy Denis ()

Method and Hist of Econ Thought from EconWPA

Abstract: This paper forms part of a research project investigating conceptions of the relationship between micro-level self-seeking agent behaviour and the desirability or otherwise of the resulting macro-level social outcomes in the history of economics. I identify two kinds of conservative rhetorical strategy, characterised by reductionism, and by holism plus an invisible hand mechanism, respectively. Like the reductionist (Friedman, Lucas) and holistic (Smith, Hayek) proponents of laissez-faire, Malthus, too, is a defender of ‘the present order of things’ and an advocate of dependence on spontaneous forces. Malthus starts out within the eighteenth-century providentialist paradigm epitomised by Adam Smith and Dugald Stewart, but he later abandons providentialism, adopting a more reductionist standpoint. Like Smith and Stewart, he takes a conservative political stance and opposes radical reform of society. But in taking up the arguments of the leading reformers of the day, Godwin and Condorcet, he is drawn to a position very far removed from Smith’s stoic optimism. Though a potent weapon against the utopians, the principle of population also undermines providentialism In the First Essay he tries to mitigate this by presenting a theodicy to reconcile his theory with a version of providentialism, but within weeks of publication he begins work on its replacement, a secular and reductionist argument that individual self- interest can guide us to socially desirable outcomes.

Keywords: malthus; rhetoric; reductionism; holism; ontology; policy prescription; invisible hand; providentialism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B12 B31 B41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm and nep-hpe
Date: 2003-11-08
Note: Type of Document - word doc; prepared on WinXP; to print on hp deskjet 940c; pages: 18; figures: None

Downloads: (external link)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/mhet/papers/0311/0311001.pdf (application/pdf)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/mhet/papers/0311/0311001.ps.gz (application/postscript)
http://129.3.20.41/eps/mhet/papers/0311/0311001.doc.gz (application/msword)

Related works:
Working Paper: Collective and individual rationality: Robert Malthus’s heterodox theodicy (2003)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wpa:wuwpmh:0311001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Method and Hist of Econ Thought from EconWPA
Series data maintained by EconWPA ().